Legal Opinion

Palm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1983No. Appeal, No. 2597 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Tressie Y. Palm has appealed from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirming the action of a referee denying her claim for workmen’s compensation benefits. The issue is that of whether disability benefits received by the claimant from insurance provided at her employer’s expense had the effect of tolling the limitation of Section 315 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 721, as amended, 77 P.S. §602. Section 315 of the Act provides:

In cases of personal injury all claims for compensation shall be forever barred,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ratto v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Segal v. SEGALSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Helstrom v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sharon Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. JohnsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Davis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Barnes v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API