Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

Enoch Barnes (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s denial of Claimant’s reinstatement petition. We affirm.

Claimant suffered a work-related injury, a lumbar-sacral strain, while in the course of his employment with Midland-Ross Corporation (Employer). Claimant received benefits pursuant to a notice of compensation payable and various supplemental agreements. On May 18, 1983, a supplemental agreement, suspending benefits, was entered into between the parties asserting Claimant’s return to work on April…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sharon Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Strattan Homes, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Crawford v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Hartman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Steibing v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Riggle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API