Legal Opinion

Heard v. Bolton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 29, 1963No. 40127PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The question presented for review is whether, as contended by the defendant, that part of the ordinance which requires a self service (coin operated) laundry to close between the hours of eleven p. m. and seven o’clock a. m. unless it has an attendant on duty during such hours is unreasonable, arbitrary and oppressive, and bears no relation to the good order, peace, and safety and health of the community.

No question is presented as to the business being a nuisance as was the case in Green v. Mayor &c. of Savannah, 6 Ga. 1, nor as to a business subject to more…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chaires v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. City of Jackson v. Murray-Reed-Slone & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  3. Town of McCool v. BlaineMississippi Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Green v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tp. of Little Falls v. HusniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. J & L OIL CO. v. City of CarrolltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  3. Township of Little Falls v. HusniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Heard v. BoltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. J & L OIL CO. v. City of CarrolltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API