Legal Opinion

Heard v. Bolton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 29, 1963No. 40127Published

1Opinion of the Court

107 Ga. App. 863 (1963)

131 S.E.2d 835

HEARD

v.

BOLTON, Judge.

40127.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided May 29, 1963.

Cumming & Cumming, Joseph R. Cumming, for plaintiff in error.

Beck, Goddard, Owen & Smalley, Robert H. Smalley, contra.

NICHOLS, Presiding Judge.

The question presented for review is whether, as contended by the defendant, that part of the ordinance which requires a self service (coin operated) laundry to close between the hours of eleven p. m. and seven o'clock a. m. unless it has an attendant on duty during such hours is unreasonable, arbitrary and oppressive, and bears no relation…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Frankum; Concurrence · Jordan.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chaires v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. City of Jackson v. Murray-Reed-Slone & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  3. Town of McCool v. BlaineMississippi Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Schacht v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Green v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API