Legal Opinion

State v. Pearson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 8, 1998No. 165PA97PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The Court of Appeals, in finding the seizure of contraband was proper, did not rely on the order of the superior court, which held the defendant consented to the search. The Court of Appeals held the search and seizure was lawful without a consent. This was error.

When an officer observes conduct which leads him reasonably to believe that criminal conduct may be afoot, he may stop the suspicious person to make reasonable inquiries. If he reasonably believes that the person is armed and dangerous, the officer may frisk the person to discover a weapon or weapons. Terry v. Ohio, 392…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. State v. LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. PeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. BeveridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. BishopIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. McClendonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. ForemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API