State v. Little
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, C.J.
The only assignment of error carried forward and discussed in defendant’s brief is to the effect that the court committed prejudicial error in failing to sustain his motion to suppress certain evidence as having been obtained as the result of an unlawful search and seizure, in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Federal Constitution and Article I, section 15, of the North Carolina Constitution.
The State offered evidence tending to show these facts: Howard Pope owns and operates a filling station and general store located ten miles north of Hillsborough on Highway #86. He closed his store…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Zap v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Judd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Ernest T. PageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. LeavittSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
- State v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.