Legal Opinion

State v. Peck

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1982No. 12PA82PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

The defendant Peck entered a plea of guilty to the charge of possession of a controlled substance but preserved his appeal from the denial of his motion to suppress the evidence of the seizure of the plastic bag from his person. G.S. § 15A-979(b) provides a right of appeal from a plea of guilty following denial of a motion to suppress. Defendant contends that the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial judge’s denial of his motion to suppress because, he contends, the evidence reveals that the item sought to be suppressed was the fruit of an unlawful search and seizure.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. McClendonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. BoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API