Bell Telephone Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIG, Judge.
This worker compensation appeal by Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, the employer, poses a straightforward question concerning the proper apportionment of a $15,000 recovery from a third party, and the legal expenses required to obtain it, where the claimant, Michael Artuch, effected a settlement of his suit against an alleged third-party tortfeasor claimed to have liability for his injury.
Applying the plain terms of section 319 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 671, 1 this court decides that the employer is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Dasconio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3Cited by9 opinions
- Darr Construction Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Pendleton v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Warner Lambert Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Deak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Emanuel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.