Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Hutcheson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 19, 1984No. 821748; CA A29984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Wife appeals from a decree of dissolution, contending that the trial court erred in failing to distribute the marital assets equitably in awarding her only $200 a month of support and in failing to award her attorney fees. We modify the decree to eliminate spousal support and to provide the wife with a share of the husband’s pension.

The parties separated in August, 1978, after a 38-year marriage. Husband is 65 years old and is retired from the Southern Pacific Railroad. He receives $1,164 per month as a pension from that company. Wife is 62 years old and unemployed. During the marriage, she…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. In re the Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Matter of Marriage of MannersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. In re the Marriage of BoghCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of RehmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API