In re the Marriage of Hutcheson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Wife appeals from a decree of dissolution, contending that the trial court erred in failing to distribute the marital assets equitably in awarding her only $200 a month of support and in failing to award her attorney fees. We modify the decree to eliminate spousal support and to provide the wife with a share of the husband’s pension.
The parties separated in August, 1978, after a 38-year marriage. Husband is 65 years old and is retired from the Southern Pacific Railroad. He receives $1,164 per month as a pension from that company. Wife is 62 years old and unemployed. During the marriage, she…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- In re the Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Matter of Marriage of MannersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- In re the Marriage of BoghCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Marriage of RehmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987