Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Rehmer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 20, 1987No. 85-1306-NJ-1; CA A39035PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

In his appeal from a dissolution judgment, husband maintains that the trial court erred in awarding a disproportionate share of the parties’ marital assets to wife and in requiring him to pay $1,300 per month as permanent spousal support. We affirm the property division but modify the judgment to reduce the amount of support.

The dissolution judgment ended a 39-year marriage. Husband is 60, and wife is 58. The parties have three children who are now adults. Husband is employed as a superintendent for an electrical construction firm, and his net income fluctuates between $2,571 and $3,689 per…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Matter of Marriage of SellersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. In re the Marriage of SellersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. In re the Marriage of RayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. In re the Marriage of HutchesonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Marriage of FisherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. In re Marriage of SheumakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API