In re the Marriage of Rehmer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
In his appeal from a dissolution judgment, husband maintains that the trial court erred in awarding a disproportionate share of the parties’ marital assets to wife and in requiring him to pay $1,300 per month as permanent spousal support. We affirm the property division but modify the judgment to reduce the amount of support.
The dissolution judgment ended a 39-year marriage. Husband is 60, and wife is 58. The parties have three children who are now adults. Husband is employed as a superintendent for an electrical construction firm, and his net income fluctuates between $2,571 and $3,689 per…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Matter of Marriage of SellersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- In re the Marriage of SellersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- In re the Marriage of RayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- In re the Marriage of HutchesonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Marriage of FisherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- In re Marriage of SheumakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989