Legal Opinion

State v. Sealy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1961No. 727PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The defendant assigns as error those portions of the court’s charge to the jury hereinafter set out. The court, after having read to the jury G.S. 20-158 (the statute which requires the driver of a motor vehicle to stop before entering or crossing certain through highways), and G.S. 20-140 (the statute defining reckless driving), charged: “If you find from the evidence in this case, * * * beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant intentionally violated one or more of the statutes read to you, designed and intended to protect human life, and * * * that such intentional violation thereof was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. State v. . StansellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. State v. BeckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. State v. HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wooten v. RussellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. RAINTREE HOMEOWNERS ASS'N v. City of CharlotteDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. GaineyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API