Legal Opinion

Wooten v. Russell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1961No. 235PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

The first question for determination is: Should defendant’s motion for nonsuit have been allowed? Young Wooten testified that defendant did not stop at the intersection as commanded by the stop signs. While a failure to stop and yield the right of way to traffic on the dominant highway is not negligence per se, G.S. 20-158, it is evidence of negligence, S. v. Sealy, 253 N.C. 802, 117 S.E. 2d 793; Jordan v. Blackwelder, 250 N.C. 189, 108 S.E. 2d 429; Johnson v. Bell, 234 N.C. 522, 67 S.E. 2d 658; and, when the proximate cause of injury, is sufficient to support a verdict for plaintiff.

Defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Loving v. WhittonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Marshburn v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Williamson v. RandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Johnson v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Caughron v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Raper v. ByrumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Galloway v. HartmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Barefoot v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Clifton v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Johnson v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API