Wooten v. Russell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
The first question for determination is: Should defendant’s motion for nonsuit have been allowed? Young Wooten testified that defendant did not stop at the intersection as commanded by the stop signs. While a failure to stop and yield the right of way to traffic on the dominant highway is not negligence per se, G.S. 20-158, it is evidence of negligence, S. v. Sealy, 253 N.C. 802, 117 S.E. 2d 793; Jordan v. Blackwelder, 250 N.C. 189, 108 S.E. 2d 429; Johnson v. Bell, 234 N.C. 522, 67 S.E. 2d 658; and, when the proximate cause of injury, is sufficient to support a verdict for plaintiff.
Defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Loving v. WhittonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Marshburn v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Williamson v. RandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Johnson v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Caughron v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Raper v. ByrumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Galloway v. HartmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Barefoot v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Clifton v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Johnson v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.