Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1986No. 6576-PRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

After a jury trial, defendant, Isiac Thomas, was convicted of one count of child molestation, A.R.S. § 13-1410, and two counts of sexual conduct with a minor under 18 years of age, A.R.S. § 13-1405. The trial court sentenced defendant to the presumptive term on each count and ordered that the sentences run consecutively. The judgments of conviction and sentences were affirmed by the Court of Appeals in State v. Thomas, 148 Ariz. 253, 714 P.2d 423 (1985).

Defendant petitioned this court for review maintaining that the trial court (1) should have suppressed defendant’s admission to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. State v. HensleyArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. McFallArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. TuckerArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. StrayhandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. State v. BlakleyArizona Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API