Legal Opinion

State v. Fulminante

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1989No. CR-86-0053-APPublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

Defendant, Oreste C. Fulminante, appeals a verdict and judgment of guilt for the crime of first degree murder (A.R.S. § 13-1105(A)(1)) and a sentence of death (A.R.S. § 13-703). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. Art. 6 § 5(3) and A.R.S. §§ 13-4031, 4033, and 4035.

II. ISSUES

Defendant raises the following issues on appeal:

A. Trial Issues:

1. Did the trial court err in determining that a paid informant for the Federal Bureau of Investigation did not violate defendant’s fifth amendment rights?

*2402. Did the trial court err in holding that defendant’s…

2Cases cited111 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. SpearsArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. EllisonArizona Supreme Court · 2006

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API