Legal Opinion
O'NEILL v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 29, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-6759PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs John O’Neill and Samuel Goodman have sued to challenge the 1989 reorganization of Philadelphia’s system of adjudicating parking violations. Plaintiffs in their second amended complaint name as defendants the City of Philadelphia (“City”), the Office of Philadelphia’s Director of Finance (the “Office of Director of Finance”), and the Philadelphia Bureau of Administrative Adjudication (“BAA”). 1
Plaintiffs claim that the 1989 reorganization violated the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto legislation, plaintiffs’ due process rights under…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- John O'neill v. City Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ZdrokSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- O'NEILL v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- O'Neill v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Duncan v. NortonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.