Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. City of Philadelphia

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 5, 1994No. 93-1378UnknownCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to determine whether the federal courts must entertain a constitutional challenge to the City of Philadelphia’s parking ticket procedures — procedures that resulted in the imposition of a $45 fine against plaintiff-appellee John O’Neill, which remains unpaid, and a $173 fine against plaintiff-appellee Samuel Goodman, which was paid. We hold that the district court should have exercised its discretion to abstain, rather than to decide the constitutionality of Philadelphia’s ticketing procedures. Thus, we will vacate the district…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John O'neill v. City Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Maurice Anthony v. Kevin Rosenberg, et al.District Court, N.D. New York · 2026
  3. OLEXSAK v. JONESDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API