Legal Opinion

Scaletta v. Silva

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1942No. Civ. 6762; Civ. 6763PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant, J. J. Silva, has appealed from judgments which were rendered against him in two consolidated automobile damage eases growing out of successive collisions.

The appellant contends that Mrs. Carlsen, one of the defendants in the first action, was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, for failure to reasonably regulate the speed of her automobile, in view of the admitted fact that, at the time of the accident, she was confronted with the glaring lights of an approaching machine; that the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in the first action is inconsistent with Mr.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. PeresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Armstrong v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Rannard v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Pacific Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Bondurant v. MastinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Squires v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Pearson v. WhitworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Phillips v. KerrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API