Legal Opinion

Lofther v. First Nat. Bank of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 16, 1941No. 3320PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, District Judge.

This suit was brought under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b), by certain named plaintiffs who are employees of defendant, on behalf of themselves and other employees alleged to be “similarly situated”, to recover various sums claimed to be due for overtime not compensated for as provided in Section 7(a) of the Act.

The named plaintiffs describe themselves as elevator operators and janitors, and allege that they also bring the suit on behalf of “others similarly situated” whom they describe in the complaint as maintenance men,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Wabash Railroad v. Adelbert College of Western Reserve UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Shain v. Armour & Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  4. Saxton v. W. S. Askew Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1940
  5. Townsend v. Boston & M. R. R.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pentland v. Dravo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  2. Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
  3. Clougherty v. James Vernor Co. James Vernor Co. v. CloughertyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  4. Maguire v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  5. Caguas Lumber Yard, Inc. v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API