Legal Opinion

Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Spoljaric

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 22, 1984No. 2-83-119-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

ASHWORTH, Justice.

Our prior opinion and judgment issued in the above referenced cause on February 9, 1984 are hereby withdrawn and the following substituted therefor.

When the attorney for Aero Mayflower Transit Company, Inc. (Aero), defendant below, failed to appear for trial, the case was tried to a jury in the attorney’s absence and judgment rendered against Aero. Aero filed a motion for new trial which was denied, and Aero appeals from such denial.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Appellant presents three points of error:(1) Error in proceeding to trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Dallas Heating Co., Inc. v. PardeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. United Beef Producers, Inc. v. LookingbillTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Mitchell v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The Moving Co. v. WhittenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. General Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. HigginbothamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. State & County Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Adams v. Kendall County Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
  5. Bmw Auto Center, Inc. v. River Oaks BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API