Legal Opinion

Blackman v. Federal Realty Investment Trust

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 24, 1995PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this opinion we are called upon to determine whether summary judgment may be entered against a plaintiff in a personal injury action where a question of fact remains as to whether a defendant landowner who possesses an easement across a parking lot where the injury occurred may be considered a “possessor of land” with a duty owing to persons injured on that portion of the lot. Based on the following reasoning, we hold that whether a party is a “possessor of land” with a duty owing to invitees is a fact question which precludes summary judgment. Accordingly, we reverse the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Accu-Weather, Inc. v. Prospect Communications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Palenscar v. Michael J. Bobb, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Leichter v. Eastern Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Bowman v. Fretts & Leeper Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Estate of Swift Ex Rel. Swift v. Northeastern Hospital of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Tenos v. State Farm InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Estate of Zimmerman v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. Tameru v. W-Franklin, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Janson v. Cozen and O'ConnorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API