Legal Opinion
Jamal Khan v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 2, 2004No. 02-73906PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Jamal Khan petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. He claims that the notice he was given of his hearing was inadequate, and that a master calendar hearing was improper, because the notice and hearing were not translated into a language he understands and therefore violated due process. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Because we hold that the government was not constitutionally required to provide English…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Gil Ilano Colmenar,petitioner v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Wang He v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Maryam Hartooni v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kalpana S. Joshi v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Popa v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Katherin Mejia-Velasquez v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- City of Sioux Falls v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Marvin Santos-Martinez v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.