Legal Opinion
City of Sioux Falls v. Miller
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 6, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1] In this case we are called upon to determine whether an employee fired for continuing drug abuse was suffering from a disability which precluded his discharge. Under the particular circumstances, we conclude the discharge was proper and reverse the Sioux Falls Civil Service Board’s order directing reinstatement.
FACTS
[¶ 2] Steven C. Miller 1 was employed full-time with the Sioux Falls Parks Department since 1977. Through 1993, his annual performance evaluations were adequate or better and each year he received a merit raise. Over the Labor Day weekend in 1994, he was assigned to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Robert E. Maddox, III v. University of Tennessee University of Tennessee Board of Trustees Doug A. DickeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- John Teahan, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Collings v. Longview Fibre Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Charles E. Little, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Investigation Joseph v. Corless John Doe William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Mack H. Williams v. Sheila E. Widnall, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hollander v. Douglas CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Green v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Farmer v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011