Legal Opinion

Anthony G. Notaras v. F. C. Ramon and Jane Doe Ramon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 22, 1967No. 20442_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was arrested without a warrant by police officers with probable cause to believe he had committed grand larceny. He was held in the Seattle city jail, without charge, for approximately thirty-six hours, while a city detective conducted an investigation. The detective concluded that the evidence was insufficient to implicate appellant in the larceny. Appellant was charged with two misdemeanors (drunkenness and resisting arrest) factually unrelated to the larceny, and was released on his own recognizance. He was ultimately acquitted of the misdemeanor charges.

Appellant filed suit for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Marjorie Glasson v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  2. Irving Eugene Ney v. State of California, Lawrence F. Pickett, Keith C. SorensonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. Apolinar Navarette, Jr., AKA Paul Medel Navarette v. Jiro J. EnomotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. Richardson v. SnowDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  5. Chubbs v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API