Legal Opinion

Apolinar Navarette, Jr., AKA Paul Medel Navarette v. Jiro J. Enomoto

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 29, 1976No. 74-2212PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*279OPINION

Before KOELSCH and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and HILL,** District Judge. KOELSCH, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Navarette, a California state prisoner, brought this civil rights action against state prison officials under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983,1985 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343; his complaint set out nine purported claims. The district court granted summary judgment for appellees as to the first, second, and third and dismissed the fourth through ninth for failure to state a federal claim. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The district court erred in its grant of summary judgment. As to…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Procunier v. NavaretteSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. JeffersArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Alonzo Bonner v. Joseph CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. Santiago v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Jacobson v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API