Legal Opinion

Holloway v. Arkansas State Board of Architects

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 3, 2003No. 02-1096PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

We granted the' Arkansas State stice. petition for review in this appeal to resolve an apparent conflict between the court of appeals’ decision in this case and prior case law.

Appellant Robert Holloway is a licensed professional engineer. In 1999, Holloway prepared and filed plans for a pre-engineered metal building to be assembled for the Rosenbaum Industrial Supply Facility on Doyle Venable Road in North Little Rock. On September 21, 1999, Tim Yelvington, an architect, filed a complaint with the Arkansas State Board of Architects, alleging that Holloway, as a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Wright v. Arkansas State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Craft v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Davis v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Arkansas State Police Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rose v. Arkansas State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Bakalekos v. FurlowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Voltage Vehicles v. Arkansas Motor Vehicle CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Teston v. Arkansas State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Bakalekos v. FurlowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API