Legal Opinion

Earl R. Wiseman, District Director of U.S. Treasury Department, Internal Revenue Service v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1962No. 6563PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

After payment of a deficiency assessment for 1955 income taxes, Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company brought this action for a refund. The question presented is whether payments received under a contract pursuant to which Halliburton agreed to the termination of an exclusive license to use and to grant sub-licenses for the use of a patented process in exchange for a non-exclusive license and one-third of the royalties received from third party licensees shall for income tax purposes be treated as ordinary income or as gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Hort v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Commissioner v. Gillette Motor Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. José FerrerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Bisbee-Baldwin Corporation v. Laurie E. Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue for the District of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. United States v. R. T. And Gertrude WoolseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  5. Brown v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API