Legal Opinion

Hort v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 31, 1941No. 517PublishedCited by 326 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

We must determine whether the amount petitioner received as consideration for cancellation of a lease of realty in New York City was ordinary gross income as defined in § 22 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1932 (47 Stat. 169,178), and whether, in any event, petitioner sustained a loss through cancellation of the lease which is recognized in § 23 (e) of the same Act (47 Stat. 169, 180).

Petitioner acquired the property, a lot and ten-story office building, by devise from his father in 1928. At the time he became owner, the premises were leased to a firm which had sublet the main floor to the Irving…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. United States v. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Helvering v. BruunSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by326 opinions

  1. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Helvering v. American Dental Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Commissioner v. Gillette Motor Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Arkansas Best Corp. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. José FerrerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

321 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API