Legal Opinion
Brown (Willadsen) v. Shalala
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 13, 1994No. CV-F-88-285 OWWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S PETITION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
WANGER, District Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on petitioner’s motion for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation April 6, 1994, that attorneys’ fees be denied as untimely. No objection has been filed. The Magistrate’s report and recommendation has been reviewed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 631(b)(1).
II
BACKGROUND
On September 22, 1986, plaintiff applied…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- (SS) Barnes v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (SS) Rhoades v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Gilman v. SSADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996