Legal Opinion

(SS) Rhoades v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 31, 2019No. 2:18-cv-01264Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY R RHOADES, No. 2:18-cv-1264 JAM KJN 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING STIPULATED EAJA AWARD; AND 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT EAJA AWARD 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF No. 22.) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Commissioner of Social Security concerning the 18 ALJ’s denial of benefits. (ECF No. 1.) The underlying action proceeded before the undersigned 19 pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(15), but not all parties consented to the jurisdiction of the 20…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Michael Williams v. Audrey KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Robert Ito Farm, Inc. v. County of MauiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Brown (Willadsen) v. ShalalaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API