Legal Opinion
Polimeni v. Minolta Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 30, 1997PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Crew III, J.
Plaintiff Marilyn N. Polimeni was employed by the Department of State. From October 1988 to May 1991, Polimeni operated a Minolta microfilm reader/printer, as a consequence of which she was continually exposed to the liquid toner used in the machine and allegedly became totally disabled. Plaintiff and her husband, derivatively, commenced this action against defendant Exxon Corporation, the manufacturer of Isopar G (the primary chemical component of the toner), defendant Minolta Corporation, the manufacturer of the microfilm machine and the distributor of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin v. HackerNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Jones v. Hittle Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Cooley v. Carter-Wallace Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Bukowski v. CooperVision Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Veil v. Vitek, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sherman v. A.J. Pegno Construction Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Urena v. The Biro Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Clinton v. Brown & Williamson Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Nagel v. Brothers International Food, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Morrow v. Mackler Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.