Bukowski v. CooperVision Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Crew III, J.
On April 18, 1984, plaintiff purchased from defendant George Roberts, a licensed optometrist, a pair of Permalens XL extended wear contact lenses manufactured by defendant Cooper Vision Inc. (hereinafter defendant). Plaintiff apparently wore the contact lenses without incident until July 4, 1984, at which time she began experiencing "a lot of dry eye symptoms”. On July 7, 1984, plaintiff’s eyes became irritated and plaintiff removed the lenses; when she awoke the following morning, plaintiff’s left eye was swollen shut. Plaintiff was subsequently diagnosed with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Amatulli v. Delhi Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Lancaster Silo & Block Co. v. Northern Propane Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Colacicco v. Apotex, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Urena v. The Biro Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Figueroa v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Liriano v. Hobart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Golod v. Hoffman La RocheDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.