Legal Opinion

State v. Enakiev

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 2001No. D9806378M; A106911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for one count of harassment, ORS 166.065(1), and one count of harassment by touching the sexual or intimate parts of another. ORS 166.065(4). Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s refusal, under OEC 404(2)(a), to allow him to present evidence of his character for sexual propriety. We agree with defendant that the court erred in excluding the proffered character evidence and that the error was not harmless. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

This prosecution arose from interactions between defendant and the complainant, D,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. LerchOregon Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. LogstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. VandeverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. State v. KruseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. REMSHCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. MituniewiczCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API