Legal Opinion

(PS) Banga v. Ameriprise Auto & Home Ins. Agency

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 12, 2021No. 2:18-cv-01072Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAMLESH BANGA, No. 2:18-cv-1072 MCE AC 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 AMERIPRISE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE AGENCY AND DOES 15 1 through 10 inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the court on defendants Ameriprise Auto & Home Insurance 19 Agency, Inc. and IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company (collectively, “Defendants”) motion 20 for an order requiring the pro se plaintiff, Kamlesh Banga, to post security for $25,000 as a 21 vexatious litigant pursuant to Local Rule 151(b). ECF No. 79. For…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Long v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Justin Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. United Seniors Ass'n, Inc. v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Harding Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API