Willacy v. Marotta
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Aubrey Willacy and Salvatore LoPresti practiced law together for decades. When Willacy retired and moved to Florida, he wanted more money for his share in the partnership than LoPresti and the new partners were willing to pay. LoPresti, Marcovy, and Marotta dissolved the firm and initiated arbitration, as the partnership agreement allowed. The district court rightly allowed the arbitrator to resolve the partners’ claims, and we remand the case only to assess whether Willacy deserves prejudgment or post-judgment interest.
I
In 1979, Willacy and LoPresti, both practicing…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harley Blanton v. Domino's Pizza Franchising LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Altruist, LLC v. Medex Patient Transp., LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
- Abbas v. Truist BankDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Geostabilization International, LLC v. Pure Construction Services, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
- Hohl v. Black Diamond Franchising, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.