Legal Opinion
Hohl v. Black Diamond Franchising, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided October 28, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00911Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DEAN HOHL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:24-cv-00911 v. ) ) JUDGE CAMPBELL BLACK DIAMOND FRANCHISING, ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE INC., ) FRENSLEY ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM Pending before the Court is Defendant Black Diamond Franchising, Inc.’s (“Black Diamond”) Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. No. 8). Plaintiff Dean Hohl (“Hohl”) filed a response in opposition (Doc. No. 9), and Black Diamond filed a reply (Doc. No. 10). For the reasons discussed below, Black Diamond’s motion (Doc. No. 8) is GRANTED. Hohl also filed a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Tonya Cooper v. Mrm Investment Company, Terry Rogers and Larry MaysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Harley Blanton v. Domino's Pizza Franchising LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.