Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1941No. 585PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with §13459-3 GC in that the appellant did not file his brief with the transcript. The failure to file brief with the transcript is conceded by appellant.

We are committed to the enforcement of this statute, which we have heretofore held to be mandatory in terms. State v Jarcho, 30 Abs 645.

GEIGER, PJ., BARNES & HORNBECK, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. JarchoOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BrunswickOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Columbus v. BalzanOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Cincinnati (City) v. HawkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. State v. BarberOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API