Legal Opinion

State v. Jarcho

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 1939No. 380PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ.

Submitted on motion of the Prosecuting Attorney to dismiss the appeal for the reasons, first, the record does not show that appellant has ever obtained leave to appeal. Second, Bill of Exceptions was not filed within time required by law. Third, Brief of appellant was' not filed with the transcript. Motion of appellant is also presented for leave, if necessary, to file papers as follows: First, transcript of docket and journal entries as of March 8, 1939. Second, Bill of Exceptions as of April 11, 1939. Third, brief of appellant as of May 3, 1939.

Both counsel for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kenney v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. State v. BrunswickOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. State, Ex Rel. Merrill v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. City of Columbus v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. State, Ex Rel. Merrill v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API