Legal Opinion

State v. Barber

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1945No. 3842PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of the plaintiff-appellee to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the brief of the appellant was not filed with the transcript as required by §13459-3 GC, which in part reads as follows:

“* * * The brief of the appellant shall be filed with the transcript and shall contain the assignments of error relied on in such appeal. * * *”

This Court passed upon this question in State v Jarcho, 65 Oh Ap 417:

“This provision as to the time of filing appellant’s brief is mandatory. It is not controlled by a rule of the appellate court. We have without exception…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Columbus v. BalzanOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Dayton v. SwartzelOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. State, Ex Rel. Merrill v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. State, Ex Rel. Merrill v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API