Legal Opinion
State v. Barber
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 20, 1945No. 3842PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BY THE COURT:
Submitted on motion of the plaintiff-appellee to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the brief of the appellant was not filed with the transcript as required by §13459-3 GC, which in part reads as follows:
“* * * The brief of the appellant shall be filed with the transcript and shall contain the assignments of error relied on in such appeal. * * *”
This Court passed upon this question in State v Jarcho, 65 Oh Ap 417:
“This provision as to the time of filing appellant’s brief is mandatory. It is not controlled by a rule of the appellate court. We have without exception…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
- Columbus v. BalzanOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Dayton v. SwartzelOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
- State, Ex Rel. Merrill v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
- State, Ex Rel. Merrill v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1948