Legal Opinion

In Re Welfare of Children of D.M.T.-r.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 2011No. A10-2301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*761OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

Appellant-mother challenges the district court’s termination of her parental rights to four of her children. She argues that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to terminate her parental rights to two of her children because they are not United States citizens. She also asserts that the district court erred by finding that her children suffered egregious harm while in her care and by not considering the citizenship of two of her children as a factor when analyzing whether the termination of appellant-mother’s parental rights is in their best interests.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. In Re the Welfare of the Children of R.W.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.E.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. Johnson v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re G. B.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  2. In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  3. IDHW v. John DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  4. In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. Q.-R. H., Mother AKA B. Q. R. H. AKA B. Q.-R. H. AKA B. Q. R. H. and F....Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API