Rosenthal v. Scott
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Alpena. Replevin. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
The questions brought up by this record relate entirely to the exemption of property from execution, and the case is one where upon the undisputed facts there is no room for much discussion.
Eosenthal was engaged in dry goods and millinery and analogous business in Alpena, and his stock was levied on by the sheriff in December, 1877. Eosenthal was allowed to select $250 worth of goods, which were set apart by themselves, and were levied on upon a justice’s execution a few days thereafter, and his claim for their protection disregarded. He then replevied.
On the trial the jury found against him…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- O'Donnell v. SegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Smith v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Hollister v. LoudMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
- Stewart v. WeltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Alvord v. LentMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by8 opinions
- First National Bank of Madison v. HackettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Fischer v. McIntyreMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Bates v. CallenderSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1883
- Parker, Holmes & Co. v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
- Cribben v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.