Legal Opinion

Fischer v. McIntyre

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1887PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Eeplevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Plaintiff is the wife of George H. Fischer, who was a tador by occupation. Previous to his marriage with plaintiff he was a widower, and had a son about 13 years of age. He carried on no shop, but worked by the piece, carrying the suits home, and there making them up. Before his marriage with plaintiff, at times when the tailoring business was dull, he worked at odd times, when he had no employment at his trade, in making up masquerade garments, and so kept on until he had made about 75 suits, which he rented out during the winter season to masqueraders. The masquerade season usually extended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. WeltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Rosenthal v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reed v. LaneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. In re National Grocer Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  3. Turner v. DavidsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Van Allen v. SpragueMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. McCormick v. KistlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API