Legal Opinion

Olinger v. Pacific Greyhound Lines

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1935No. Civ. 1179PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial in an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by Annie Olinger, wife of W. E. Olinger, while she was a passenger for hire on a bus operated by defendant, a common carrier. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of five thousand dollars. The motion for new trial was granted particularly because of two erroneous instructions given to the jury at the request of plaintiffs.

Counsel for plaintiffs tacitly admit error in these instructions but urge they were not prejudicial because the same subject-matter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kay v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Valente v. Sierra Ry. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Cody v. Market St. Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Patterson v. San Francisco & San Mateo Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Preluzsky v. RittigsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. MegladderyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Fisher v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Sassano v. RoullardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Grover v. Sharp & Fellows Contracting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Nance v. Fresno City Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API