Legal Opinion

City of Shreveport v. Nejin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1917No. 22287PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from City Court of Shreveport; D. B. Samuel, Judge. F. A. Nejin was convicted of violating an ordinance of the City of Shreveport prohibiting the keeping of a blind tiger, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.

The defendant was convicted of violating an ordinance of the city of Shreveport prohibiting the keeping of a blind tiger, defined by the ordinance as a place where spirituous, malt, or intoxicating liquors are kept for sale, barter, or exchange or habitual giving away in that city, where the sale of spirituous malt, or intoxicating liquors is prohibited. He was sentenced to pay a fine of $100, or, in default thereof, to be imprisoned 100 days. On appeal he urges á number of bills of exception taken to the overruling of his motion to quash the affidavit and his motion for a new trial and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. State v. DalonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Housing Authority of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. State v. NejinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. State v. GuidrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  4. Gremillion v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  5. Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API