Legal Opinion
Kimble v. MARVEL ENTERPRISES, INC.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 2, 2010No. CV 08-372-TUC-DCBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID C. BURY, District Judge.
On December 2, 2009, Magistrate Judge Ferraro issued a Report and Recommendation (R & R). (Doc. 77.) He recommends granting Defendant’s motion on termination of royalties when the patent expires and Plaintiffs’ motion on the definition of “net product sales.” He recommends denying Plaintiffs’ four other motions. After an independent review of the record, the Court adopts the R & R as the opinion of the Court and grants and denies the motions for summary judgment accordingly.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
The duties of the district court in connection with a R & R by a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Stephen Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Corteva Agriscience LLC v. Monsanto CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2024