Stephen Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal calls on us to again construe the Supreme Court’s frequently-criticized decision in Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U.S. 29, 85 S.Ct. 176, 13 L.Ed.2d 99 (1964). In Brulotte, the Court held that a patent licensing agreement requiring a licensee to make royalty payments beyond the expiration date of the underlying patent was unenforceable because it represented an improper attempt to extend the patent monopoly. Id. at 30-33, 85 S.Ct. 176. We have previously noted that Brulotte has been read to require that any contract requiring royalty payments for an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pitney Bowes, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Celina Mestre, Personal Representative of the Estate of Luis Mestre, Deceased, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Brulotte v. Thys Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Abbvie Inc. v. Medimmune LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Atrium Medical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Ares Trading SA v. Dyax CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- BRADLEY CORPORATION v. LAWLER MANUFACTURING CO., INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.