Legal Opinion

Stephen Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 16, 2013No. 11-15605PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal calls on us to again construe the Supreme Court’s frequently-criticized decision in Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U.S. 29, 85 S.Ct. 176, 13 L.Ed.2d 99 (1964). In Brulotte, the Court held that a patent licensing agreement requiring a licensee to make royalty payments beyond the expiration date of the underlying patent was unenforceable because it represented an improper attempt to extend the patent monopoly. Id. at 30-33, 85 S.Ct. 176. We have previously noted that Brulotte has been read to require that any contract requiring royalty payments for an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Celina Mestre, Personal Representative of the Estate of Luis Mestre, Deceased, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Brulotte v. Thys Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Abbvie Inc. v. Medimmune LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  3. C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Atrium Medical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. Ares Trading SA v. Dyax CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  5. BRADLEY CORPORATION v. LAWLER MANUFACTURING CO., INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API