Legal Opinion

Herrick Corp. v. Canadian Ins. Co. of Cal.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1994No. G013771PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

Introduction

It is hard to imagine another set of legal terms with more soporific effect than indemnity, subrogation, contribution, co-obligation and joint tortfeasorship. Perhaps because the words describe legal relationships between multiple parties, they are vaguely reminiscent of complex mathematical equations which, after all, also describe relationships, except in numbers rather than words—and for most of us, they are about as easy to understand. Even lawyers find words like “indemnity” and “subrogation” ring of an obscure Martian dialect.

For better or worse, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Pauline v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. American Automobile Insurance v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Diamond Heights Homeowners Ass'n v. National American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. City of TurlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Heppler v. J.M. Peters Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Reliance National Indemnity Co. v. General Star Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Federated Rural Electric Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Bailey & Sons, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API