Legal Opinion

Wheeley v. Smith

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1960No. 2500PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellee filed a third-party complaint against appellants. Appellants answered and counterclaimed against appel-lee for an unliquidated amount but claiming $1,650. Appellee failed to answer the counterclaim and a default judgment was entered against him in January 1958. While the entry of judgment sets forth the amount sued for, no ex parte proof was taken. Thus the entry must he treated as an interlocutory entry of default rather than a fully matured judgment, subject to ex parte proof before it could become final. In June 1959 appellee filed a motion to vacate the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hantman v. ZeigerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Little v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Mid Atlantic Appliances, Inc. v. PotterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leiken v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Lancaster v. CanuelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Leiken v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API