Legal Opinion

Morrill v. Little Falls Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the district court for Morrison county, entered on the pleadings pursuant to an order by Baxter, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This action was brought to determine an adverse claim to real property in Morrison county, plaintiff in his complaint alleging himself to be the owner and in actual possession thereof. He caused personal service of the summons to be made upon himself as president of the defendant corporation, and also upon one Townsend as its secretary, on November 19, 1888. More than 60 days thereafter (January 30, 1889) personal service of the summons was had upon defendants Boaeh, Thompson, and Laura B. Herrick, and on the same day service was duly made on defendant Nathan Herrick, by leaving a copy of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Dodge v. WoolseySupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. Baldwin v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  4. Bronson v. La Crosse & Milwaukie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  5. Donohue v. LaddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Seitz v. MichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Morrill v. Little Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Eggers v. National Radio Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Waymire v. San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  5. National Power & Paper Co. v. RossmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API