National Power & Paper Co. v. Rossman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for St. Louis county to restrain defendants from voting certain stock of plaintiff corporation, evidenced by certain certificates field by defendants Rossman and McAlpine, at tfie annual meeting to be field August 1, 1911, and to fiave certain transactions mentioned in tfie opinion declared null and void and for otter relief. Tfie facts are stated in tfie opinion.
Read the full summary
Action in tbe district court for St. Louis county to restrain defendants from voting certain stock of plaintiff corporation, evidenced by certain certificates field by defendants Rossman and McAlpine, at tfie annual meeting to be field August 1, 1911, and to fiave certain transactions mentioned in tfie opinion declared null and void and for otter relief. Tfie facts are stated in tfie opinion. Cfiarles A. Scfiultze and others, as stockholders in plaintiff corporation, moved that a certain stipulation of dismissal of tfie action mentioned in tfie opinion be vacated and that they, in behalf of…
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
The plaintiff, National Power & Paper Co., is a Minnesota corporation, organized in 1905. Defendant Eossman has at all times been its secretary, treasurer, and general manager, and, up to May 15,. 1912, a director.
It is alleged that in 1907 said Eossman entered into negotiations1 with the state of Minnesota for the purchase of certain timber to be' sold at public sale, and advised the board of directors that he had arranged to have same bid in for the corporation; that he in fact-caused the same to be bid in, for $748.75, in the name of defendantMcAlpine, as part of a plan to defraud the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Jones v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Bronson v. La Crosse & Milwaukie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Wheeler v. Abilene Nat. Bank Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Ex parte GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Melady-Briggs Cattle Corp. v. Drovers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Hiser v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Pearlman v. PearlmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Phillips v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.