Legal Opinion
Jimenez v. Franklin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 22, 2012No. 10-56199, 10-56292, 10-56294PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:
Anthony Albert Jimenez appeals from the district court’s orders granting full satisfactions of judgment as to defendants John Franklin, Gilbert Duron, and Ryan Bergner. Franklin, Duron, and Bergner, along with co-defendant Gabriel Frank Gonzalez, were found to have violated Jimenez’s civil rights and held liable for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court awarded attorney’s fees and ordered that all four defendants were jointly' and severally liable for the fees. Defendants Franklin, Duron, and Bergner appealed the judgment, including the fee award,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jimmie Lee Riley v. David T. KurtzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Guillermo Gallego Munoz v. County of ImperialCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Shepherd v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Parker v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Keup v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Joshua Kelly v. Timothy WenglerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Harold Hall v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Kelly v. WenglerDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2014
- Cascadia Wildlands v. Scott Timber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- In re: Erik Samuel De Jong and Daryl Lynn De JongUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.